<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog &#187; botax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/tag/botax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Drops Cosmetic Surgery Tax &#8211; Considers Indoor Tanning Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/2009/12/senate-drops-cosmetic-surgery-tax-considers-indoor-tanning-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/2009/12/senate-drops-cosmetic-surgery-tax-considers-indoor-tanning-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elective procedure tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports over the weekend say the Senate has dropped the elective cosmetic tax from the healthcare reform bill, but strangely, they decided to trade one controversial tax for another;  a 10% tax on indoor tanning is now being considered as &#8230; <a href="http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/2009/12/senate-drops-cosmetic-surgery-tax-considers-indoor-tanning-tax/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports over the weekend say the Senate has dropped the elective cosmetic tax from the <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-345" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px;" title="tanning_tax" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/tanning_tax-300x199.jpg" alt="tanning_tax" width="240" height="159" />healthcare reform bill, but strangely, they decided to trade one controversial tax for another;  a 10% tax on indoor tanning is now being considered as another method of financing healthcare reform.</p>
<p>Of course just as representatives from the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery and other groups spoke out against the elective cosmetic tax, people from the Indoor Tanning Association (a colorful group I&#8217;m sure) are publicly opposing the tax. Their executive director says the tanning industry and the many small businesses that make it up, have been “thrown under the bus.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/solmaz-poorsattar/senates-proposed-tax-on-i_b_399675.html">Some are calling it a great idea</a>, citing the health risks of tanning and its widespread appeal among young people.  What&#8217;s your opinion?  Is tanning such a risk that we should implement taxes to discourage it?  What if small business owners are forced to close shop?</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200912191812DOWJONESDJONLINE000332_FORTUNE5.htm">CNN &#8211; Cosmetic Surgery Tax Out: Tanning Tax In</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eddscosmeticsurgery.com/blog/2009/12/senate-drops-cosmetic-surgery-tax-considers-indoor-tanning-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

